“Truth is this is half intelligent commentary and, sadly, half pathological malice —
toward anyone with a different opinion.
Their explanation of Legal Realism is coherent and engaging.
Their presentation of historical cases illuminates the practical application of this perspective.
The three are equally sharp, have great rapport and it COULD be an amazing podcast — but it is not
They offer no intelligent argument against cases they disagree with.
Instead, they become lame partisans:
laughing while making personal attacks and idiotic, puerile accusations.
The conversation becomes so shallow
and so . . . dumb
it’s hard to believe the same people are speaking.
As a top grad from a top law school, I feel qualified to judge and do acknowledge
the eloquence and accuracy on display when offering their perspectives.
But their inability and unwillingness
to reasonably articulate views of those they oppose quickly makes it a chore to listen
That this inability and unwillingness
seems normal to the hosts is alarming”
KJMLALA16 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
12/10/22