Biased
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“This podcast is extremely biased. They only talk about the rights of the people and the promises made by the constitution. They don’t consider the needs of the ultra rich and making the police’s job of harassing people easier. Should talk more about why the justices actually do understand the common man, like those who lend them private jets.”
Russell goodman via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
04/29/23
More reviews of 5-4
“The concept of reviewing critical cases and the political influences of the justices just screams 5 stars. Well insert this podcast as the poster child to make you confident in three peoples ability to logically argue both sides of an issue.”
all day full via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
03/27/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Mics are better than both of the houses of law, descendants of king Mike Dikta, but the posting game is weak.”
jackpebs via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
03/15/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Other, better SCOTUS podcasts feature expert analysis from top lawyers with actual SCOTUS experience. Not sure if the hosts of this slog have even been inside the Supreme Court building. The first two episodes offer warmed-over "legal realist" analysis of cases that have been analyzed in...”Read full review »
ArmandWillis via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
03/06/20
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
