Minimally engaging
While appreciate having a podcast to present this interesting content, it's not a very engaging podcast. I'd strongly encourage AJP to try a two-host format, where one host explains an article to the other host, who asks clarifying questions, and then they switch roles for the next article. Annals of Emergency Medicine uses this format for their podcast, and it makes for a MUCH more engaging and educational listening experience, without markedly increasing the work required to produce the podcast.
SackAckAck via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 05/29/17
More reviews of American Journal of Psychiatry Audio
The information being presented is essential for good psychiatric care, but it is very hard to maintain attention over 30 minutes when one person softly reads the synopsis of each of the studies. For hypnotic induction, this would not be a bad approach. However, having a couple of people...Read full review »
Wangdu via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 03/06/08
Wonderful chance to get the conclusion of the journal content every month. Thanks a lot for keeping it free.
Dr. insaan via Apple Podcasts · Canada · 11/09/09
Overall the podcast offers good content, but as others have mentioned there are several problems. Often I'm not able to get the podcast to start or if I stop midway I can't get back to it later, unless I start from the beginning. The discussions are sometimes too long and should instead be more...Read full review »
David Bar via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 04/28/14
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »