100 episodes
Counter Apologetics Emerson Green
-
- Religion & Spirituality
-
-
4.6 • 147 Ratings
-
An informal look at religious apologetics and philosophy from an atheist and naturalist perspective.
-
Losing My Religion – with Fuad Abdullah Harahap (@fubilosophy)
I’m interviewed by Fuad Abdullah Harahap (@fubilosophy) about my deconversion, the sad state of Christian apologetics, my issues with the skeptic community, free will, the afterlife, agnosticism, and a few other topics. Fubilosophy Linktree
-
CA131 What would convince you?
What would convince you of God’s existence? Specifically, the Christian God. What would change your mind and cause you to convert? I name three things: Christian aliens, miracles, and religious experience. That’s not an exhaustive list, but those things would dramatically raise my credence in Christian theism. I spend the most time talking about religious … Continue reading CA131 What would convince you? →
-
CA130 Am I Agnostic?
The world is religiously ambiguous: It can be interpreted in various incompatible ways, and the interpreters are not necessarily violating any standards of rationality in doing so. As for me, I don’t feel any position being forced on me by the evidence. My best efforts to judge the total balance of evidence weighing for and … Continue reading CA130 Am I Agnostic? →
-
CA129 Universalism Debate: John Buck vs. Emerson Green
Returning guest John Buck joins me to debate universalism, eternal conscious torment, and other topics related to hell and the afterlife. My Playlist on Hell Linktree
-
CA128 No, math does not prove God
I respond to the wildly popular Redeemed Zoomer video about proving God’s existence with math. To see the open hangout that took place afterwards, you can watch the original livestream (unedited with no postscript) on YouTube Linktree
-
CA127 What’s wrong with the moral argument?
We wrap up our series on the moral argument for theism, summarize several problems with the argument famously associated with William Lane Craig, and discuss two other moral arguments for God that are not abysmal failures like the standard moral argument. Linktree
Customer Reviews
Great show!
Well done!
Emerson is absolutely fantastic.
His format and guitar licks… straight fire.
Too generous with very weak Christian arguments
Treating the Bible as if it is actually a series of historical documents and not a strange amalgam of mythology with a little bit of history sprinkled in is very problematic. For example, there is no archaeological evidence that the Jews were enslaved in Egypt. That’s a big historical problem. We should be more skeptical of claims of history without actual documentation than this podcast is, and for the host to criticize atheists on this point when he admits that this is not his area of specialty undermines the credibility of the entire show.