Compelling… but biased
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“It’s a very compelling story, but the narrative is so incredibly biased that I found it frustrating as a listener. If the evidence (or lack of) is so absolute and damming, why not just put it out there and let the audience decide what we think? Instead, we are spoon fed this man’s innocence every other sentence. In addition, the juror admits that the DNA evidence played a negligible role in their decision to find Ron guilty, so i don’t think it would have changed Ron’s fate unfortunately.”
amanda369 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
04/03/24
More reviews of In The Blood
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The Greek tragedy reference is a perfect description of the unfortunate and even unlikely change of events that led to Ron’s conviction. A true tragedy, Greek or otherwise, of an innocent man falsely convicted.”
cpbe via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/31/24
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“So much rambling and nonsense, all the actual evidence could have been stated in one possibly two episodes. The host is extremely monotone and either edited others or only chose to speak to those who are almost as monotone and boring as him.”
yeppersqwerr via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
03/18/24
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
