“I found season 2 very biased from the beginning. Repeating “fought for an appeal and won” over and over and then saying Flowers is still in prison- he won an appeal not the case. The journalist also began the season saying something along the lines of “newly discovered / reported” evidence in her year of research. So we are supposed to believe that she did a better job in the year she researched the case (21 years after the crime) than both the defense and prosecuting attorneys did over the course of 6 trials??”
nicoleLB via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/07/19