There you go again.
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Timmy — You are Exhibit A in the proof of value of the IDTF podcast. FWIW, when you are making vague ad hominem arguments supposedly about science, at least use proper English grammar and try to avoid conflating the singular and plural in the same sentence.”
BenRunkle via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
06/02/18
More reviews of Intelligent Design the Future
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“This podcast does NOT belong in the science & medicine catagory, it belongs in religion. Science needs to be able to make predictions and then conduct experiments prove the predictions. Intelligent Design CANNOT do this and therefore is NOT a science. Please move it to the correct category.”
Bullsh1t via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
09/14/06
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Jonathan Wells shows once again that ID is unwilling to learn from its mistakes. Yes, many phyla seem to appear out of nowhere in a 50-100 million period of time, called the Cambrian explosion and yet, both fossil and other evidence shows clearly how these phyla connect to pre-cambrian times. Of...”Read full review »
Pimothy via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/30/06
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“continues to be so lazy that it'll make up anything about why we are here rather than do the research in Evolution!”Read full review »
SolarSiStar via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/02/09
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
