Reviews
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Thank you, Dr. Catherine D. DeAngelis! I appreciate your dedication and humor in the podcasts. You are so inspiring!!”
exia in tw via Apple Podcasts ·
Taiwan ·
03/13/24
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Great place for cardiology news. This podcast does feel, at times, “anti-innovation”, and the speaker does have a bias towards or against certain practices and treatments, but overall I appreciate the scepticism and really do applaud the hard work he puts in.”
Tomthebomb92 via Apple Podcasts ·
France ·
01/22/24
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Good summation of studies to keep Uptodate while you are driving or doing stuff.”
Mendicinored via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/25/22
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Most articles are high quality and/or meaningful. The podcast is well worth listening to and a blessing to society. Thanks putting in the effort to make this available. Keep doing hard work!”
tim-qwerty098 via Apple Podcasts ·
Canada ·
12/22/21
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Not very different from just reading abstract conclusions of various articles. Needs better audio and, while editors can write these summaries, better off finding people with better podcast voices.”
GolfFiend via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
11/21/21
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The ‘host’ maters. Thank you Ed and JAMA podcast staff for this high quality output. The way your podcasts are edited and presented is an example for NEJM and Annals podcasts.
Ibrahim,
New Zealand”
Ibzal via Apple Podcasts ·
New Zealand ·
10/15/19
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“every episode is well prepared. pretty good for those dont have the time to go through print contents”
写不完毕业论文的学渣不是好学霸 via Apple Podcasts ·
China ·
08/16/18
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Listen during my daily commute. Well organised podcast with just enough information to work out whether I need to go to the online article later. Highly recommended for busy physicians!”
PCW13 via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
12/05/17
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“To all the people that love to criticize, it's easy for you to criticize, but it's much more difficult to contribute...”Read full review »
PathMax via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
08/26/17
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The new narrator (who was actually on a prior podcast episode), Dr. Livingston, is nice.
That said, I agree with @flyingpoodle's review, it does make it slightly harder to follow, but if you're multi-tasking it tends to break up the segments a bit so you know. The intro of external...”Read full review »
wmdny via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
08/21/17
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I prefer a single voice throughout the podcast, I can understand the appeal to some of having authors speak about their articles, but it makes it harder for me to follow. I like your podcast because of the single voice format, not in spite of it.”
flyingpoodle via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
08/17/17
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I'm a first year medical student trying to get an introduction to current research. This is a very approachable, quick and easy way to see what is going on. I disagree with negative comments about the host. He is great, and is very appropriate for th medium, being the editor in chief of JAMA.”Read full review »
guy11111111 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
07/11/17
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Informative, succinct, and very enjoyable!!”
Gewargm via Apple Podcasts ·
Canada ·
11/01/16
“I sort of liked Dr DeAngelis's podcast readings, not a professional voice but clear and understandable and sometimes humorous. Since she left the newer narrators are much worse, not at all enjoyable or entertaining. Annals of Internal Medicine podcast also used to be great and now stinks...”Read full review »
SkepticalWV via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/29/12
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Regading the podcast for Vol 307, No. 2: The podcast sounds like it was recorded in brief 30 second segments and at least 2 repeat making the podcast sound like a broken record.”
MATTMT via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/28/12
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“It's a good journa; great articles and excellent popular interest pieces. Absolutely terrible narration. It's distractingly bad. I haven't listened in a year and really wish I could. Wish it were more like the Annals podcast; fun narration, interviews, etc”Read full review »
Impact Factor via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/30/11
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Pod cast little more than a reading of abstracts and titles of articles, not much help. Look at NEJM as an example of a useful podcast - summaries most of the articles nicely so I can select the few I really need to read completely. And if your going to to a short podcast, I think spending 10%...”Read full review »
whhaymd via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/02/11
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Excellent quality, great personality of the editor shines through.”
Eternally12 via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
04/27/10
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Just tuned in this week for the first time, so very disappointed to hear at the end of the podcast that the editor intends to continue as the reader/personality. I found it grating; humor that falls completely flat, and a singsong reading style that just doesn't convey meaning very well. I...”Read full review »
MarkSelden via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
11/18/09
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I had to stop listening.”
pterandon via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/25/09
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The operative term is annoying. I used to read JAMA religiously, I pick and choose now. I keep hoping the podcast will be more informative and less preachy. Also, the inane prattling on about the cover artwork has got to end. JAMA is supposed to be about medicine. An article synopsis would be nice.”
Pestisboy via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
04/17/09
“Die Chefredakteurin fasst kurz, pointiert und treffend den Inhalt der aktuellen Ausgabe des JAMA (Journal of American Medical Association) zusammen. Manchmal ist der etwas schleppende Ostküstenakzent angesichts der vielen Fachbegriffe für mitteleuropäische Ohren schwer zu verstehen, alles in...”Read full review »
PeeJot via Apple Podcasts ·
Germany ·
01/28/09
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I appreciate that Dr. DeAngelis takes the time to make this podcast both informative and entertaining. You definitely won't fall asleep listening to her! Excellent work and hope to see more podcasts from JAMA in the future.”Read full review »
huffstra via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/15/08
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“NEJM、LANCETも聴いていますが、JAMAのspeakerDrが一番聴き取りやすい優しい話し方をされます。 シカゴのダウンタウンに風が舞う様子が浮かんでくる、日だまりのような暖かい語り口で癒されます。 内容的には前述した２誌がやや優勢な気もしますが、ほんわか気分で仕事のストレスを和らげてくれるのでこれが一番気に入ってます。”
KeyNie via Apple Podcasts ·
Japan ·
10/12/08
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“This journal is full of great info, but I found this podcast difficult to remain focused. It could be presented in a more entertaining way.”
littlebitofall via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
07/17/08
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I understand that JAMA's audience is medically-inclined. But some of us laity have an interest in health and medical news and it would be nice if JAMA could produce a "consumer" podcast that summarizes the latest week's issue IN PLAIN ENGLISH. If AMA is going to spend millions of...”Read full review »
0898BeautifulSouth via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
05/23/08
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“It is funny to hear her repeatedly butcher the pronunciation of "cannabis" and other words. Overall, the podcast is good for what it is -- a quick survey of each week's JAMA contents.”Read full review »
itunes_site via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/06/08
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Its nice to hear these summaries & commentaries. I like Dr D's voice & her manner. She is not dry or boring, like so many medical lectures. Ever fall asleep in Grand Rounds with a speaker that drones on & on? At least this speaker keeps your mind from wandering AND presents...”Read full review »
WildHog via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
07/20/07
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Her commentary isn't cute. She made a Hooters joke. Seriously this journal is too prestigious for her to be reading it. It doesn't sound professional. Even if she was hilarious, they should hire a reader.”Read full review »
SoWhat via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
06/19/07
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I love her dry wit. She kills me...and makes the pocast great! I wasn't expecting it to be so entertaining!”Read full review »
mensetmanus via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
12/21/06
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“まず、editor-in-chiefの方の英語の発音がきれいですし、自然に英語のリスニングの勉強になります。普段何気なく使っている医学英語の発音が実は間違っていた、なんてことがしばらく聞いていると出てくると思います。微妙にギャグなんかも言っていて、人柄のいい人なんだろうなあ、って言うのがにじみ出ています。 内容はトップジャーナルの最新のものなので間違いありませんし、普段はあまり意識していない専門外の情報も入ってくるので医者としての見識が広がるように思います。 こんなに至れり尽くせりのものが無料で手に入る！すべてのドクターにお勧めします。”
morimana via Apple Podcasts ·
Japan ·
09/14/06
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Just a bunch of B.S. the more I hear, the more I believe the pharm industry is writing this stuff.”
pogi pogi via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
05/28/06
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I've listened to the podcast and quite frankly I am a bit surprised by the idea that the good doctor is not right to voice this program. Podcasts are not meant to be professional in most cases and therein is the beauty of them. What makes Dr. D. qualified to speak is that she is the...”Read full review »
Berkhof via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
05/25/06
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Dr. De Angelis should put down the mic and let someone with real speaking skills do the job of podcasting. JAMA is an important journal and her cute, homey style is not appropriate. She lacks both presentation and organization skills. (For example, doesn't bother to correctly pronounce names...”Read full review »
your pal Al via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
05/21/06
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Dr. DeAngelis explains and summarizes the complicated cutting-edge research articles by putting articles into a broader context to general science listeners. She is also very entertaining to listen to! It's a perfect example of what a educational podcast should be.”Read full review »
rmtphd via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
04/09/06
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
