Description
Join Jeremy and his wife April as they discuss Jeremy's essay on toxic empathy, and the under-appreciated antichrist threat at the core of the social justice movement.
So much wickedness is done today under the guise of Christ-like morality devoid of Christ Himself. It's great to be gentle and just and kind, but if those things are done without Jesus as the author and finisher of our faith...if they're done in a secular sort of way...then we're in trouble. In fact, we're already seeing some of the results of this, even among our churches!
We'd love you to join us in thinking about this topic so that we can be more aware of both ditches on either side of the narrow road...the ditch of Satanic power and destruction, and the ditch of antichrist Christ-less compassion.
On this episode, we talk about:
1:10 Toxic Empathy and the Spirit of Antichrist (an essay by Jeremy Pryor)
6:10 Jesus vs. Social Justice
14:57 No morality or correct politics without Christ
21:59 No boundaries leads to toxic compassion
24:28 The uncomfortable response of many churches on the topic of family
27:00 Could we have seen social justice and the spirit of antichrist coming?
Resources Mentioned:
Family Inc
===
Subscribe on Substack ➡️ https://jeremypryor.substack.com
Follow Jeremy on Instagram and Twitter.
===
Welcome to Jeremy Pryor's Podcast, or what I like to call, "Jeremy Pryor Unfiltered." We are excited to bring you seasons of content all the way from Tolkien to Theology, from Business to Family. If you like to contemplate deep philosophical ideas across a wide range of topics, you've come to the right place. Make sure to subscribe on Apple, Spotify, or YouTube so you don't miss out on future episodes!
Marriage, monogamy, the family, and children are under attack.
But there's so much information, so many posts, infinite news articles...all coloring our vision and distracting us, which means it's hard to pinpoint exactly what went wrong, and where.
Jeremy and Conn Carroll discuss the history...
Published 11/26/24
The 2024 election was really a contest between the masculine and the feminine.
Trump represents the hyper-masculine in a number of ways we'll get into in this podcast, whereas Kamala represented the hyper-feminine (perhaps not personally, but on a policy and partisan level).
What are the...
Published 11/19/24