“Just listened to season 2. I thought the reporting, format, editing was great… the op-ed portion, with very little in the way of fact but only her “feeling” (in fact, seems the majority of the “evidence” presented left more questions about guilt than answers) was incredibly disappointing and (in my opinion) unethical. I could not conclude definitively from the information and interviews he was guilty beyond-reasonable doubt. Buy by voicing her opinion, she put the finger on the scale without much to back it up other than the issue with the dog, 1/2 of which I def believe based on my extensive experience w foster puppies (surprising what they can do) the other 1/2 of which I don’t know bc I can’t see what she’s taking about. Anyhow I don’t know that he DIDN’T do it but I certainly don’t know beyond a reasonable doubt that he DID, based on what I heard, which is ostensibly the burden of proof for conviction.”
E5trella333 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
05/01/22