Factually incorrect
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I wanted to like this, but they get facts wrong. For example, in episode 42 on Judge Harold G. Carswell, the female narrator says the judicial filibuster was done away with in 2017. That’s.....wrong. In 2013, the Senate eliminated the the 60 vote rule (filibuster) for executive branch and federal judicial nominations with the exception of the Supreme Court. In 2017, the Senate went all the way and ended it for the Supreme Court as well. How can the narrators leave those details out and claim to be objective, factual, and nonpartisan?”
Joelle is sick of politics via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/01/20
More reviews of Political Scandals
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Love the content, but it feels like I’m listening on half speed because they talk so slowly! Spped it up for 5 stars”
Los Gibbers via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
11/05/19
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“As a political nerd, I’m enjoying the series. But, it would be SO MUCH MORE COMPELLING if it included primary source material, rather than merely overly curated scripted narration.”
RLA-262 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
12/03/19
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I feel like I’m generally listening to two people read alternating sentences in a Wikipedia article.”
utmuhbs via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
09/11/20
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
