Episode 33: 28 years later
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Liked the first season. But episode 33: 28 years later...” had loud breathing, moving paper, sucking on something while interviewing Steve Duffy, “a jury consultant.” Totally rude both to Steve Duffy and the listeners! Why interview the guy if your going to be so unprofessional? Is this how this season is going to go? Or is it just because the you’re writing off what the guy has to say? Scott Reeder you are no Sarah Koenig.”
Karla4 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
08/30/18
More reviews of Suspect Convictions
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Love this podcast. The amount of knowledge about this case is great. I'll be waiting each week for the next episode... would love for them to be longer!!”Read full review »
Catgregm via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/14/17
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
Shellbell1223 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/13/17
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Good sampling of voices from the past and from now. The advertisements in the middle of the show need to have a little more transition so it doesn't just blend right into the rest of the show.”Read full review »
Abby Von via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/14/17
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
