“The first few episodes are interesting and filled with eye-witness testimonies and discernible facts. After the details of Tommy’s crime are told, the narrator tells a story that can’t be distinguished between his own embellishments and what actually happened. Towards the end, I started rolling my eyes with the narrator’s fictitious accounts of events. He doesn’t support any claims with sources and doesn’t separate fact from his own fiction. Are the last few episodes just made up due to the lack of information on the case? Who’s to say because the narrator doesn’t provide any explanation or sources. After episode 5, don’t waste your time.”
erica111111111 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
07/21/21