Hold the syrup please.
Not sure where all the mucky muck interviews come from but the episodes would go down a lot easier if much of it was eliminated. The stuff I’m referring to are the victim impact statements, and the post-hearing comments by the murderer’s family members. Why? Because it’s always the same, it’s very personal, and waving them around in a podcast demeans them and drags the narrative into the dark depth of droll, syrupy, melodrama. Please don’t parade people’s morose pain for my entertainment. The story is enough. The gory details are enough. A victim’s impact statement is for judge and jury. I have subtracted a whole point for this. Otherwise, great work. When my UK friends try to tell me how violent Americans are, and how meek the British are in comparison, I love pointing them to They Walk Among Us.
Bschora via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 02/12/23
More reviews of They Walk Among Us
This is an amazing podcast and so well presented. Shows cases first from victims perspective and then from the criminals. Keep up the good work guys. Can't wait for more.Read full review »
Jwluke via Apple Podcasts · Great Britain · 11/24/16
The way. The narrator. Pauses. Every 2 seconds. As though. He's having. An athsma attack. Means. That it takes. 30 minutes. To convey. 5 minutes worth. Of information. That aside, great podcast, but either get someone else to read the script, or stop the attempts at dramatic pauses multiple...Read full review »
Pjk89 via Apple Podcasts · Great Britain · 12/10/16
Very well researched and interesting cases in this podcast. I enjoy the British accent and recognise some of the cases from the media; this podcasts brings new insight, whilst being sensitive and respectful of victims and the families. Keen to hear more. Great job.
Webalina via Apple Podcasts · Great Britain · 11/30/16
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »