“Host and guests share claims that are portrayed as factual but have no supporting evidence. Buzzwords and anecdotes drive the conversation. Connecting dots is considered research and at best is misleading and at worst not grounded in reality at all. For example, the host and guests claim that UNECO made plans to abuse children starting in 1964 but provide nothing to back up this claim. Looking at the 1964 report on UNECO meetings, you can see their suggestions on raising and educating children directly contradict this claim. I’m sure the host would argue these plans were made in secret and this document forged as a distraction, but again they only provide theory and not concrete evidence to support it.
Listeners who don’t engage with this podcast critically are left to believe the speakers at their word regardless of reality.”
happycappybara via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
06/05/23