Self-Refuting
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Professor Amar says laws passed before women had the right to vote ought to be struck down for that reason alone. Yet he defends the U.S. Constitution, which was ratified, checks notes, before women had the right to vote. What a deeply unserious thinker!”
The S.K.P. Machine via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
05/31/22
More reviews of Amarica's Constitution
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Fair, balanced, astute, Amat guides listeners through the thorns and thickets of constitutional law and the Supreme Court. Well done.”
napoleon213 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
05/05/22
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Thank you Akhil Amar and Andy Lipka for one of the best podcasts ever. I’ve listened to them all, and the most recent (“The Brief in Brief”) twice— or 3 times. Each time is a true joy of learning different and new things. I was fascinated by the discussion of the petitioner’s brief, the “Pinckney...”Read full review »
Long time Booknotes Lover via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
11/01/22
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“1. Doesn’t 14th Amendment say “make or enforce” simply because it contemplates prior existing law?
1b. Wouldn’t it never make sense for 1st Amendment to say “enforce” because it applies to Congress which is only legislative and has no Exectuive power, as opposed to “States” which have...”Read full review »
Uluru'02 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
12/03/21
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
