Can be overly pessimistic, and make many claims without data or stats
I love the premise of the pod and the BFW website which I read almost religiously. My gripe with the show is how opinionated the hosts can be without supplementing their claims with good stats. The hosts criticize Gnabry and Upamecano regularly, but their evidence is often anecdotal and places too much weight on mistakes rather than putting those critiques in context of other aspects of their performances. Personally, I listen to sports commentary to learn something I don’t know from experts or well-read individuals. Right now, the show just feels like a space for upset fans to air their grievances, and I worry this culture of negativity (unintentionally) contributes to harassment of players on social media, and leads to some players to perform worse or leave on a free transfer.
BEbertz via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 03/07/22
More reviews of Bavarian Podcast Works
I feel the negatives are too much. As a club we shouldn't be fans of players. We should support the club but most of you always criticising the coach and his choice of players and tactics even when we win. INNN so toxic against this team sometimes I wonder if he's a fan. Gosh. Getting...Read full review »
eagleyez7 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 02/15/23
Chuck Smith is the only real bright spot. Some of the hosts are so negative and unbearable to listen to.
wjones44 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 03/01/23
Love the podcasts. Keep it up
Djdisksxncmdkzxmc via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 01/26/22
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »