Unethical journalism
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Amy Brittain’s attempt to link the judge’s past indiscretion to his sentencing is unethical and heinous. You can’t cherry pick sentencings with no info or context. Any person with some sense could tell you that. How the WAPO allowed this story to run is mind boggling and made me cancel my subscription to the post. Also, according to the Judge, it was consensual, and while he regrets doing it, it was legal. This is a he-said she-said non-story that seems aimed at ruining a man’s life who dedicated his entire world to helping the downtrodden. I don’t think we should judge someone on their worst mistake. Shame on you Amy Brittain, and shame on the WAPO. #metooovercorrection”
ClaireClaire1 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/08/20
More reviews of Canary
“History of repeated sexual assaults by powerful MEN on Young teenagers over centuries: the foundation of Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalysis on a victim heiress by a his father’s mistress’s husband; the Carol Griffin’s sexual assault by Tim Morrison; Professor Ford’s sexual assault by Judge Kavanaugh;...”Read full review »
Jerusalem J via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/03/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Exceptional reporting. Great storytelling. Brave women.
Kudos reporter Amy Brittain”
JTB1313 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/04/20
“Exceptional reporting, remarkable women, and a maddening reminder of the thousands of sexual abuse survivors living in a shell, in silence, carrying the shame and burden of protecting themselves, their abusers, and the people who failed to protect them. But also a story of hope, healing, and peace.”
jrockslammer via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/04/20
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
