Unethical journalism
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Amy Brittain’s attempt to link the judge’s past indiscretion to his sentencing is unethical and heinous. You can’t cherry pick sentencings with no info or context. Any person with some sense could tell you that. How the WAPO allowed this story to run is mind boggling and made me cancel my subscription to the post. Also, according to the Judge, it was consensual, and while he regrets doing it, it was legal. This is a he-said she-said non-story that seems aimed at ruining a man’s life who dedicated his entire world to helping the downtrodden. I don’t think we should judge someone on their worst mistake. Shame on you Amy Brittain, and shame on the WAPO. #metooovercorrection”
ClaireClaire1 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/08/20
More reviews of Canary
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Powerful! Loved it.”
TMD💖 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/06/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“As an abuse survivor, thank you for your kind and compassionate handling of this important story. For the courage of Lauren not accepting the handling of her case and for Carol coming forward to reveal the history of the judge. Thanks to the women for their courage and resilience and to the...”Read full review »
GMA2012 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/05/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Brave women! Great reporting!”
jingcc via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/01/20
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
