Thinly veiled partisanship
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“If you want a fair depiction of the law that takes into account both sides of an argument, this is not the podcast for you. It’s like watching a debate and the moderator acts as a shill for one side while claiming to be impartial.”
Rick Nowak via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/05/24
More reviews of Cases and Controversies
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Good synopsis of the law. But focuses heavily on the breakdown of the court and partisanship. Insistent on framing judges as conservative and liberal is not that productive. Would be more interesting if focused on methodology of the justices rather than perceived partisanship or lack thereof.”
trust meeeee via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
08/05/21
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Will unfollow if 10-15 minute podcasts is all you can muster.”
lackinganickname via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/26/19
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Love the dialogue and occasional input from guests. Perfect way to get your SCOTUS fill. Keep it up!”
Sle44 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
04/30/20
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Twitter
Facebook
Instagram
Patreon
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
