Episode 79: Should Prosecutors File Criminal Cases If There's Still Reasonable Doubt?(with Jess Falcis)
Description
TW: Mentions of murder and rape;
The theme for Debatable IV's open octofinals is Sociolegal! It is said that due process is nothing more, and nothing less, than the concept of fair play. In most jurisdictions, the right of a person to due process is protected with procedural rules. One of these rules is that a criminal case may only be filed by a prosecutor who finds probable cause that the accused actually committed the crime charged. Supposedly, the probable cause standard makes it so that prosecutors don't file baseless or frivolous cases. However, whether that actually happens is debatable.
That's why this motion reads: THBT prosecutors should use the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt instead of probable cause when deciding whether to file a criminal case against a suspect.
There is an infoslide: The standard of probable cause is met when evidence exists to prove that the suspect is more likely than not to have committed the crime. A finding of probable cause does not require the prosecutor to inquire whether there is evidence to secure a conviction or whether there is evidence that could exculpate or acquit the suspect. The standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt is met when evidence exists to produce moral certainty, not absolute certainty, that the accused committed the crime. Alternatively, it also means that no evidence exists so as to produce reasonable doubt that the accused did not commit a crime. We thank our Immortal friend Jesus Falcis (in DOTA 2 rankings!) for contributing this motion to our tournament!
00:00 Introduction
1:11 What is the current procedure for instituting criminal cases?
4:43 Why does the prosecutor have the ability to file the case?
7:18 What's the difference between probable cause and beyond reasonable doubt?
11:13 Is it all over when the prosecutor files the charge?
12:46 Framing on opening gov
16:22 Framing on opening opp
20:55 Arguing on opening gov
24:00 Arguing on opening opp
30:50 Extending on government side
36:31 Extending on opp
40:15 Advice for legal motions
42:16 REGISTER TO VOTE!
We are proud to present the last Post-Debate Analysis of our Debatable Open series! The Open Grand Finals of our event was all about different issues here in the Philippines. We would like to thank Gab Pacaño for their motions.
Motion 1: In 2017, Former President Rodrigo Duterte signed a...
Published 05/10/24
For the Novice Finals and Open Semifinals of Debatable Open 2024, we talk to Jill Aycardo for the motion theme: RELIGION!
Motion 1: [4:26]
In religious scriptures, the cause for sins and suffering is usually sourced from the temptations and desires of individuals. Generally, these desires are...
Published 05/07/24