I’m just here so they get more eyes
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“At the hosts prodding to review for the algorithms to get the show more exposure I’m writing this review. It’s a good Supreme Court podcast with informed guys talking about the court, inside baseball style.”
listener_20040813 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
07/02/22
More reviews of Divided Argument
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Will is excellent, but Dan constantly talks over his co-host. Every time Will tries to make an argument defending a conservative judicial position, Dan constantly interrupts and admonishes him for having the opinion that he does. Often times, it feels like Dan believes he is owed Will’s...”Read full review »
stegilbe2013 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
05/06/23
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Since First Mondays ended, I’ve been looking for a good, balanced Supreme Court podcast that focuses on the law. In my humble opinion Advisory Opinions is pretty good, and Strict Scrutiny is pretty bad, but both are pretty openly partisan. It’s great to have Will and Dan, top scholars who come at...”Read full review »
legaleagle22 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
05/16/21
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I started following the show in my 2L year and haven’t missed an episode since. Professor Baude and Professor Epps keep their discussion accessible, yet highly nuanced and detailed. Their balanced discussions are especially useful for those still developing their ideological views about...”Read full review »
Aaron_ACL_1 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
11/28/22
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Twitter
Facebook
Instagram
Patreon
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
