Good stories - "scientific" support derails story
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“These are interesting stories and told pretty well. However, the constant break in the flow of the narrative to quote 'psychological research' to speculate on the protagonist's states of mind derail the story. It's unnecessary and interrupts the flow way too much, often stating the obvious - like how the death of a child or a lover's rejection would affect a person - with no *real* evidentiary support. If this is an academic podcast it needs to be more rigorous - and I don't think that's what the narrators are aiming for - better just allow yourself the license to speculate and tell the narratives which are compelling. If you are introducing some really unusual ideas it might work but several times an episode...? The voices of the 2 women are complementary contrasting the different themes of the narrative.”
user109485 via ·
03/30/18
More reviews of Female Criminals
“I wanted to love this but Vanessa‘s co-host sounds completely automated, robotic and remote. It is as if Siri or Alexa is reading the podcast and it’s very distracting.”
mwspecial via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
03/21/18
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I can’t wait for every Wednesday when a new podcast comes out! I’m hooked!”
Lashley5928272 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
04/05/18
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I can’t get past the way this sounds.”
LAgirl7 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
03/23/18
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
