Puntificating the application process
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“This is a great show, but I was compelled to take off one star for the annoying British spelling used in the show's title. Setting that minour issue aside it's brilliant.
In fact, I enjoy it so much I have been seeking out where to submit my contestant application to no avail. I assumed there would be an application involving some sort of pun-based test, but I have yet to find any. I am beginning to wonder if it is like the Price is Right and I just need to get tickets to the live studio audience and hope they call me down.
Fortunately, I have some time to figure this out. You see, I have finally cracked the code to the irregular output of shows, and I've discovered that it can be predicted by biorhythms. Using the combination of the 23 day humor cycle, 33 day intellectual cycle and Marsh's 28 day drinking cycle, I have calculated the highest odds of another episode in 66 days. If I'm wrong though, I blame the irregularities of Marsh's drinking cycle and may have to incorporate epicycles into the next revision of my theory.”
Adam Slagell via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
05/20/13
More reviews of InKredulous
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“A lovely, chuckly slice of skeptihumour. I heartily endorse it.”
Clinton Huxley via Apple Podcasts ·
Great Britain ·
02/10/11
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
Scepio via Apple Podcasts ·
Great Britain ·
04/25/10
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I look forward to every new Inkredulous episode with comic discussion of current skeptical topics from a panel of interesting guests. My only complaint is that we don't have more shows so I'd love more listeners to try this and encourage new episodes please!”
Sean Atkinson via Apple Podcasts ·
Sweden ·
04/12/11
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Twitter
Facebook
Instagram
Patreon
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
