Description
Subscribe on Substack ➡️ https://jeremypryor.substack.com
Follow Jeremy on Instagram and Twitter.
Today Jeremy is joined by Matt Franklin of Foundation Father. They discuss pre-Christian civilization, the absurdity of internet athiests arguing from a position so entrenched in Christian ethics, and what we can reason from first principles if we were to create a societal safety net that did not start with the presupposition that equality is the ultimate good.
On this episode, we talk about:
01:04 Matt's thread about why internet athiests would be begging for Christendom
05:43 The non-existent safety net in pre-Christian pagan culture
11:58 Did the values of our civilization get "reasoned" into existence during the Enlightenment?
14:42 Rational Christian presuppositions and the lack of intellectual athiests
16:48 Reasoning from first principles
18:43 Creating a safety net from first principles that balances the tension between those who want to help people and what is fair and just
22:50 A countercultural way to run a business
Resources Mentioned
Matt, Foundation Father on Twitter
MAFranklin.com
Tom Holland and NT Wright Video
Dominion: How The Christian Revolution Changed The World by Tom Holland
Family Inc on FamilyTeams.com
The Family Plan Calendar on FamilyTeams.com
Man and Woman in Christ by Stephen Clark
---
Welcome to Jeremy Pryor's Podcast, or what I like to call, "Jeremy Pryor Unfiltered."
We are excited to bring you seasons of content all the way from Tolkien to Theology, from Business to Family.
If you like to contemplate deep philosophical ideas across a wide range of topics, you've come to the right place.
Make sure to subscribe on Apple, Spotify, or YouTube so you don't miss out on future episodes!
Marriage, monogamy, the family, and children are under attack.
But there's so much information, so many posts, infinite news articles...all coloring our vision and distracting us, which means it's hard to pinpoint exactly what went wrong, and where.
Jeremy and Conn Carroll discuss the history...
Published 11/26/24
The 2024 election was really a contest between the masculine and the feminine.
Trump represents the hyper-masculine in a number of ways we'll get into in this podcast, whereas Kamala represented the hyper-feminine (perhaps not personally, but on a policy and partisan level).
What are the...
Published 11/19/24