Description
Jeremy Pryor is joined by his daughter Sydney to discuss a couple of relevant cultural topics. They react to the dystopian vision one of Obama's old campaign ads shows (which we see playing out even moreso today), then react to Louise Perry on the Triggernometry Podcast as she suggests that urban environments are killing fertility and that villages are "reproduction machines".
Learn to see what's going on around you as government and anti-family messaging seeps into more and more areas of our life, so that you can build a thriving family...even when it seems like everything is against you.
On this episode, we talk about:
0:33 Recapping July 4th in a small, cohesive town
3:07 Obama's dystopian campaign ad (and why it's actually a theological question)
13:53 The question isn't "are these things important" but "should government be doing these things?"
24:24 Louise Perry on the Triggernometry Podcast on urbanization and birth rate
28:56 Villages are like reproduction machines
34:17 What elements to consider when choosing a "village" to live in to build a multigenerational family team
---
Subscribe on Substack ➡️ https://jeremypryor.substack.com
Follow Jeremy on Instagram and Twitter.
---
Resources Mentioned:
The Life of Julia Ad
Family Revision by Jeremy Pryor
Louise Perry video
---
Welcome to Jeremy Pryor's Podcast, or what I like to call, "Jeremy Pryor Unfiltered." We are excited to bring you seasons of content all the way from Tolkien to Theology, from Business to Family. If you like to contemplate deep philosophical ideas across a wide range of topics, you've come to the right place. Make sure to subscribe on Apple, Spotify, or YouTube so you don't miss out on future episodes!
Marriage, monogamy, the family, and children are under attack.
But there's so much information, so many posts, infinite news articles...all coloring our vision and distracting us, which means it's hard to pinpoint exactly what went wrong, and where.
Jeremy and Conn Carroll discuss the history...
Published 11/26/24
The 2024 election was really a contest between the masculine and the feminine.
Trump represents the hyper-masculine in a number of ways we'll get into in this podcast, whereas Kamala represented the hyper-feminine (perhaps not personally, but on a policy and partisan level).
What are the...
Published 11/19/24