“The judge ignores the Islamic doctrines Hamas and other Islamic jihadists use to justify their actions. Gaza was not and is not an “open air prison” as the Judge and Ritter mistakenly claim. Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005, Israel left 14 million dollars worth of greenhouses in Gaza, and Gaza gets billions in international aid. What did the Gazans do with this largesse? They elected Hamas, Hamas bought advanced rockets, grenade launchers, turned the greenhouses into weapons storage facilities, and deceived Israel with a ceasefire into letting its guard down so after two years of planning, Hamas could behead babies, rape women, burn people alive, and gauge people’s eyes out. Israel did not “provoke this” Hamas attack as the Judge claims. In Islamic doctrine, once a land is Islamic it is always Islamic and the end times in Islamic doctrine can only occur once the Jews have been eliminated. Hamas(and other Muslim jihadists) cite these doctrines. The Judge (and Ritter) ignore this. The Koran also contains multiple verses saying the Jews are “vile”. One verse even says the Jews are the “descendants of apes and pigs”. Not every Muslim believes this stuff but enough do and, especially in Gaza and much of the Middle East. Thus negotiation is not possible with such people. The Judge (and Ritter) also just seem to accept civilian casualty figures given by Hamas as Gospel and then they rail against Israel after they have bought Hamas propaganda. I agree with the Judge (and Ritter) on Ukraine but I turned off the Judge after listening to his misanalysis of the Israel/Hamas situation and failure to understand the primary role adherence to certain aspects of Islamic doctrine is playing (the Judge and Ritter aren’t the only ones who have misanalysed this situation but I can’t stomach listening to misplaced claims about Israel anymore—-there is enough of that garbage on mainstream media channels)”
AntiJihadXI via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/22/24