Description
Di Cecco v Contini [2004] VSC 211
Armando Contini died in 2002 leaving three adult children. His daughter Giuliana and his two sons Fulvio and Mario.
In the last 10 or so years of his life, there was a severe breakdown in Armando’s relationship with his two sons – involving two significant disputes and loss of contact.
In contrast, during that time Giuliana had stepped up to provide more care and companionship to her father.
This resulted in Armando executing his final Will to leave most of his estate to Giuliana and make minimal provisions for his sons.
After his death, the sons contested the estate claiming that their father did not have capacity at the time he made his last Will.
Armanda had anticipated that his sons would challenge his estate and he took steps to thwart them.
CASE: Wallis v Rudek [2020] NSWSC 162; Wallis v Rudek (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 215
Yuri & Olga Wallis were in financial crisis. They were about to lose their house in Pennant Hills, Sydney.
The property was worth $950,000 but they owed $840,000 to the bank and they were unable to pay the...
Published 11/10/24
CASE: Fiorenza v Fiorenza [2024] NSWSC 549
This case involves a dispute between Irene Fiorenza and her son Matthew Fiorenza over ownership of the property at 69 Amherst Street, Cammeray.
Irene had inherited the property from her late mother in 2016 and had let her son Matthew and his family...
Published 11/06/24