Description
Pilkvist & Coburn (Deceased) [2019] FamCA 635
There are two interesting parts to this matter.
First, there is the family law application from a supposed de facto partner, seeking a division of property.
Second, there is a criticism and reprimand of the solicitor and barrister who represented the applicant.
In this episode, we look at the family law application in which Ms Pilkvist claimed to have been in a de facto relationship with Mr Coburn for 5 years up until they were separated against their wills when Mr Coburn's guardian moved him into a nursing home.
She was seeking a property division that would see her receive a 35% share of Mr Coburn's $11million estate.
Her application was opposed on behalf of Mr Coburn, on the basis that they had never been in a relationship and that Ms Pilkvist had only been his paid carer.
CASE: Wallis v Rudek [2020] NSWSC 162; Wallis v Rudek (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 215
Yuri & Olga Wallis were in financial crisis. They were about to lose their house in Pennant Hills, Sydney.
The property was worth $950,000 but they owed $840,000 to the bank and they were unable to pay the...
Published 11/10/24
CASE: Fiorenza v Fiorenza [2024] NSWSC 549
This case involves a dispute between Irene Fiorenza and her son Matthew Fiorenza over ownership of the property at 69 Amherst Street, Cammeray.
Irene had inherited the property from her late mother in 2016 and had let her son Matthew and his family...
Published 11/06/24