Description
CASE: Rydzewski v Rydzewski [2024] NSWSC 802
Maria Rydzewski had 4 children: Kevin, Barbara, Danuta and Stan.
In July 2016, Danuta died and Maria (who was 91 years old at the time) was deeply affected by her daughter's death.
There became a rift in the family due to a dispute as to whether Stan had caused his mother to miss Danuta's funeral.
A year later, Maria transfers two properties to her daughter-in-law Jenny and one property to her granddaughter Krystina. The reason for the transfers? In gratitude for the care they provided her AND to prevent Stan from inheriting any share of the properties.
The transfers were done by a solicitor, Mr Ireland. Because Maria could not speak English, all of the instructions came from her translator, her daughter-in-law Jenny.
This case raised many questions, some that remained unanswered.
Did Stan cause his mother to miss Danuta's funeral?
Did Maria have capacity in 2017 when she transferred the properties?
Did she transfer the properties under influence or unconscionable conduct on the part of Jenny and Krystina?
Did Maria get adequate legal advice from her solicitor?
The answers to those questions would determine whether the property transfers would be voided.
CASE: Wallis v Rudek [2020] NSWSC 162; Wallis v Rudek (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 215
Yuri & Olga Wallis were in financial crisis. They were about to lose their house in Pennant Hills, Sydney.
The property was worth $950,000 but they owed $840,000 to the bank and they were unable to pay the...
Published 11/10/24
CASE: Fiorenza v Fiorenza [2024] NSWSC 549
This case involves a dispute between Irene Fiorenza and her son Matthew Fiorenza over ownership of the property at 69 Amherst Street, Cammeray.
Irene had inherited the property from her late mother in 2016 and had let her son Matthew and his family...
Published 11/06/24