“While the content of this particular Podcast part 1 and 2 was interesting, it was somewhat disturbing to hear the reporters or narrarators discredit Mr. Lucas’ account of his own life at every turn.
It was established by the writer from the start that Mr. Lucas, according to them, had a habit of exaggerating, but the constant mention of what seemed doubtful to them, became suspicious to me and eventually nerve wrecking. It was obvious that whomever had written or put the program together did not write it or report the information from an objective perspective and instead ruined their hard work by continually discrediting a man’s account of his own life. Though at a point or two in the story it may have been necessary, the overkill soured the tone overall.
Hopefully the next one will be more objective and less condescending toward the peron of interest.
—PhillyPenz”
PhillyPenz via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
11/26/18