“Starts out promising but veers into sensationalism when it tries to “expose” the publishing industry for its alleged crimes against social justice. Surely there’s another way to frame whatever lessons exist here, or at least deploy a more journalistic method to prove the host’s point? The Dan Mallory episode — which is about exploitation of facts — is a WILD example of thesis supporting evidence (rather than the other way around). Also — the scripts badly need an editor. I should have given it 2 stars, actually.”
bam526 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
09/01/22