“I would recommend this show to people interested in the case, but keep an open mind and know that the producer of this show has the ability to control the narrative in whatever way they prefer to, to fit their idea of what occurred. It’s human nature and very few people are able to present something like this that is free of any bias and subjectivity.
Given that, I found it a good story of a true crime event. I call it a “story” intentionally, as that’s how I approached it. Read as much facts and determine for yourself. The show had me rushing in for the next episode.
Like just listen to the opening statement of the next “…psyche” show after Melly in the teaser, and you can see how much she controls the narrative with her choice of words and how she emphasizes things that paint the man in a pretty negative light. Anyway, listen for yourself and try to ignore the phrasing, tone, and editing of the producer.
Giving it 3 stars because I enjoyed it, but feel there is bias in there, in my opinion. Which direction that bias is in, I will keep to myself.”
Twe£v€. ..' via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
05/14/24