“The discussion by Matthew Levendusky about the Supreme Court was the most superficial banal bit of pablum I’ve heard in a long time. My views on the Court are not based on New York Times reporting. Nor is it based on its partisan ruling on Roe. It’s the fact that for the past few years, this Court twists its argument to fit its predetermined decision. And in many cases they actually twist the “facts” to support their predetermined decision (eg. See Kennedy). They bounce between their interpretation of “originalism” or “textualism” or “history and tradition” to support their partisan position. They have gutted voting rights. They have stalled the trial decisions on Trump. You didn’t even mention the two biggest reasons for the illegitimacy of the Supreme Court. The overt corruption of Alito and Thomas. And the immoral and totally partisan appointment of Gorsuch and Barrett. Your speaker was vapid and your analysis of his paper was shallow. Very disappointing.”
DrDK2 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
05/29/24