The Government’s bill to exclude the last vestiges of the hereditary peerage from the House of Lords has cleared its Second Reading debate in the House of Commons – but should it have proposed a more ambitious reform of the Upper House? With some MPs calling for wider changes, including several Conservatives who think the Church of England bishops should be removed alongside the hereditaries, Ruth and Mark look at the prospects for the Bill and the chances of it being amended to include other reforms. Could peers attempt to block it when it comes before them? And what does Monty Python have to do with all this? As Labour celebrate a hundred days in office Mark fails to detect a Kennedy/Camelot vibe and Ruth warns that having squandered political capital on avoidable scandals they are also failing to keep their promise of better law-making, by pushing through ‘skeleton bills’ which give sweeping powers for ministers to make the law at a later date with minimal scrutiny from Parliament.  Plus, ‘assisted dying’ will be the top issue among this year’s Private Members Bills; but there are other meaty issues to chew on, like tackling climate change, requiring solar panels on new homes, regulating Airbnb-style short accommodation lets and banning mobile phones in schools. And with MPs and election candidates menaced by violence and intimidation, what solutions might emerge from a proposed Speaker’s Conference? 🎓 Learn more using our resources for the issues mentioned in this episode.   ❓ Send us your questions about Parliament:   ✅ Subscribe to our newsletter.   �� Follow us across social media @HansardSociety / @hansardsociety.bsky.social   £ - Support the Hansard Society and this podcast by making a donation today.   Parliament Matters is a Hansard Society production supported by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust.   Producer: Richard Townsend   Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.