Episode 42: A Liberal Interpretation of the Rules Is Primarily

Episode 42: A Liberal Interpretation of the Rules Is Primarily Granted for the Employee’s Favor

Listen now

Description

#HernanDoIt #Bar2023 In its appeal, the employer asserted that it was neither given summons relating to the employee’s amended complaint, nor notified of the scheduled hearings before the Office of the Labor Arbiter. Should it be allowed to present countervailing evidence on appeal? Reyes v. Rural Bank of San Rafael (Bulacan), Inc., G.R. No. 230597, March 23, 2022.

More Episodes

See all »

Episode 65: Appalling Disregard of Physical Safety and Property

#BarNiJLo2024 The employee was dismissed from employment allegedly because of reckless driving. Was the termination of such employment declared valid? Mariano v. G.V. Florida Transport, G.R. No. 240882, 16 September 2020.

Published 07/24/24

Paulino Ungos III's Podcast

Published 07/24/24

Episode 64: Nothing Contradictory Between a Definite Employment Period and the Nature of the Employee’s Duties

#BarNiJLo2024 The complainants in this case claimed to be regular employees of the company since they performed services necessary and desirable to its business. Was this stand upheld? Tuppil, Jr. v. LBP Service Corp., G.R. No. 228407, 10 June 2020.

Published 07/17/24