Very biased in discussions
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I was looking around for a new F1 podcast when I came upon F1 weekly and I have to say this is disappointing especially when I say it was 4 1/2 stars, they have to be paying these people to review this.
The discussions were incredibly biased which offered no food for thought, I think these gents are confused about their position when they selected the podcast medium.”
Matthewdking90 via Apple Podcasts ·
Great Britain ·
02/28/17
More reviews of F1Weekly.com
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“NasirWhose work is usually impeccable screwed up on the latest podcast. When he said that German authorities had passed on information about insider trading relating to Toto to British authorities. he never mentioned that the Germans said at the time that they had found no evidence at all of any...”Read full review »
myohmy2cents via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
08/26/21
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Good content but hard to hear”
No cnx hate this update via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/30/18
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I like the research and thorough fact checking that goes into each episode, but if you read gpupdate or f1live, you know everything they talk about. Sound quality is absolutely horrid with MANY compression artifacts. The over and/or mis-pronunciation of driver names gets old quick. Could be better.”
ex-lax overdose via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/15/09
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Links
Twitter
Facebook
Instagram
Patreon
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
