Interesting, but far from reality
The parallel reality that the duo articulates is extremely interesting. But—their nonsensical ramblings perfectly depicts their historic illiteracy. The duo joined forces in order to perpetuate political fallacies caused by their inept biases. When it comes to distant history, the pair’s inaccuracies seem rather benign and due to ignorance of the nuances of American political history. However, the historical discrepancies and pontificating proven fallacies of newer “scandals” shows true bias. The latter shows malice and nefariousness. If they kept their own immoral wants and ideals out of the topic at hand, it would be a 3/5. Having hosts who were knowledgeable of history and politics, along with the previously mentioned, would make it a 5/5. -Historian
PlaZmaTiK89 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 01/23/20
More reviews of Political Scandals
Love the idea of covering political scandals and they do a pretty good job of making history interesting and telling the story, but they have started to, at an increasing rate, injecting thinly veiled modern political commentary into the history. It’s unfortunate and unnecessary and not what the...Read full review »
Gsejak via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 12/11/19
Every time I listen, I learn something new. Thank you pals!
cegler via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 01/11/20
So far, seems uneven, especially compared to consistently good “Espionage” and “Con Artists” Parcast originals. Unlike those, this one does not identify source material. Surprisingly, narrators emphasized Hamilton’s ambition to become President/-overlooking fact Constitution precluded him as...Read full review »
Peter N Hillman via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 11/21/19
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.