I love this podcast. And I’m giving it one star.
I’m a tremendous fan of this podcast. But one notorious mistake has damaged its credibility so badly, that I’m giving it a low rating. At the end of the October 2024 episode, the host contends that if Trump were to win, he would only have four years. While legally true today, we’ve seen in other countries around the world how elected officials find ways to circumvent their own laws to stay in power. Presidential is far better at looking backwards (5 stars). When it comes to assuming what will happen in the future, it should probably wait until it has passed.
The Reviewru via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 11/09/24
More reviews of Presidential
This is becoming one of my favorite podcasts, for content reasons. Sound levels are bad, especially when it's clear the interview was done by phone and not in person. The questions about whether you would have a blind date with the president really diminish this podcast, pivoting it from...Read full review »
Dvdjeff via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 03/21/16
I’m having a great time with this podcast. I think the sound engineering and tone has improved considerably since the first few episodes. I would like more depth to the history, but my wife said she likes the discussions about character and personality, so I guess it’s hitting the mark with the...Read full review »
Bodiam C. via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 04/06/16
This has the potential to be a great series. The guests have a great deal of insight to offer. However, the technical problems, and in particular the unprepared-ness of Julie Miller (Library of Congress) is distracting and frankly, annoying. It detracts from whatever information she may impart....Read full review »
Mpozniak via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 03/08/16
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.