As the 2024 presidential election approaches, the Republican National Committee (RNC) is taking proactive steps in battleground states like Pennsylvania. Anticipating legal complications, particularly around mail-in ballots, the RNC has signaled its readiness to engage legal measures to address and clarify these issues. For instance, there has been specific mention of the RNC chair announcing plans to sue Bucks County over confusion regarding mail ballot procedures. This suggests a strategy to ensure clarity and fairness in the election process, presumably to protect the integrity of votes from the Republican electorate. In Pennsylvania, a pivotal state that has swung various elections, local election officials have been fortifying their operations against an expected upsurge in litigation. The spotlight on mail ballot procedures underscores the complexities introduced by on-demand printing systems. These systems, while not classified as early voting, are designed to streamline the voting process but may also introduce elements that are prone to misinterpretation or dispute. Amid these legal and logistical preparations, the GOP is also channeling significant energy into campaigning. The deployment of a "women's tour" featuring influential figures like Lara Trump, Danica Patrick, and Sage Steele in swing states is a strategic move to galvanize a critical voter segment. Notably, Danica Patrick, a former professional race-car driver who admitted she has never voted before, represents an interesting choice to inspire new or irregular voters to participate in the electoral process. Such campaign strategies combined with legal readiness indicate a dual approach by the RNC: mobilizing supporters while solidifying legal grounds to contest or clarify contentious electoral processes. The emphasis on both the legal framework and active campaigning demonstrates the importance placed on swing states in securing a win in the forthcoming election. This multi-pronged approach by the RNC in battleground states like Pennsylvania highlights the increasingly complex nature of modern American elections, where legal challenges have become as strategic as the campaigns themselves. As both parties brace for a contentious election, the actions of the RNC reflect a broader trend of preemptive measures aimed at safeguarding electoral integrity and maximizing voter turnout from strategic demographics. As such, the blend of legal strategies with targeted campaigning will likely remain a hallmark of major party strategies in closely contested states.