Content is excellent, audio quality hurts my ears
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Eminent legal scholars discussing crucial legal issues. Usually excellent summaries and often good insights into cases pending or just decided. A very important source because ordinary news reports of Supreme Court decisions are generally inaccurrate and often misleading. But WHY is the audio so terrible? This has to be fixed; there is no reason for such an eminent organization to present something so poorly.”
Secular Human Being via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
07/27/08
More reviews of SCOTUScast
“The review from 2008 is still the case. Great legal analysis, poor audio quality. Like listening through a warbly tin can. I hope the Federalist Society people read the reviews. Please make the podcast listenable.”
JamesB1776 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
03/20/15
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“If you just want a SCOTUS case quickly broken down with no discussion unlike the teleforums, this is a fantastic series.”
1Lsudokufan via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
05/14/19
“The content is excellent, but the audio quality is so bad that it is almost always hard to listen. Please upgrade the audio quality to make this an intellectually exciting podcast.”
JulieRiversCapital via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/25/18
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
