Review of Severed Affair - Repetitive and insensitive

Repetitive and insensitive

☆

“I listen to a lot of true crime podcasts that share details about gruesome crimes while respecting the victim and victim’s family. This is not one of those podcasts. Episode 1 was okay, though it definitely included gruesome details. But I couldn’t even get past episode 2. So much was repeated, including graphic descriptions of Shad’s body and the process of his death. It was too much, completely unnecessary and flat out disrespectful to Shad. I should have known by the title that this podcast would not be providing any type of ethical true crime commentary.”

aimclste via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 01/23/24

More reviews of Severed Affair

See all »

Not a good title

☆

“I'm not a very sensitive person but the title is awful for the nature of this crime, shame on those who approved it. Was it created by someone from Dateline? Aside from the repetitive recordings, this was told well. It was straight forward and not opinionated. In regards to the court...”Read full review »

0gtgirl0 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 01/10/24

Drags

☆

“Listening to the first episode, there is already too much filler material, such as long lists of material found at the crime scene and exhaustive decried police procedures. They do little to advance the story.”

slow_learner_2019 via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 10/12/23

Well done !

☆

“Wondery produced another great podvasy.”

Teon77 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 10/08/23

Do you host a podcast?

Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.

Get Chartable Analytics »