Has potential, but gives way to lack of objectivity and balance
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Really great concept for a podcast, but the libertarian tilt is so pushy that it makes me question the reasonability behind the analysis. To be clear, I’m not taking exception to the libertarian view itself in this review, but that it essentially seems to be unchallenged and accepted as fact, making the overall analysis tainted and questionable.”
Peezey44 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
06/10/19
More reviews of Short Circuit
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I love the hosts' perspective added to the case review rather than simply reciting the facts.”Read full review »
thinkdifferent79 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/03/17
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I used to think this podcast provided some useful insights into areas of the law that I wasn’t familiar with. But then they started talking about areas of the law I was familiar with, and it wasn’t even slanted commentary—it was flat out wrong or, at best, half truths. This is particularly...”Read full review »
Lennygetsome via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/04/23
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The show has gotten sillier and duller. Emphasis on court activities has been replaced by emphasis on lawyers, and lawyers are a bore. If you care how “en banc” is pronounced, this is the show for you. I prefer knowing what is happening with the law.(And in the months since I wrote this it has...”Read full review »
nicmart via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
06/27/23
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Twitter
Facebook
Instagram
Patreon
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
