“I absolutely disagree with "scienceListener" about this podcast. I think he needs to listen to more than two episodes before he passes judgment.
As someone new to the skeptical movement, I found this podcast extremely valuable as a launchpad... a starting point. It highlights great skeptical thinkers like Michael Shermer, James Randi... etc.
This podcast isn't meant to be the ultimate forum where science and religion are pit against each other. It by no means pretends to serve that purpose. It is a podcast by skeptics for skeptics in a world that inherently doesn't understand and is hostile to skeptics.
scienceListener seems to expect all skeptics to dig their own grave by bickering amongst themselves, questioning their own well established ideas instead of enlightening others. Maybe he is one that expects this podcast to give "equal time" to religion, pseudoscience, pseudohistory before it is truly "skeptical." If so, he is mistaken.”
LaughingMan via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
12/28/05