“"Science and Skeptic Thought." "Truth in podcasting." I am really skeptical of those claims.
I feel that the hosts of this podcast are pushing an agenda. Before you dismiss me, you should know that it is an agenda that I generally agree with. However, I feel that the description and supposed ideas behind the podcast misrepresent what you will actually hear.
Skeptics question what they agree with as much or more than they question opposing views. The hosts of this show do not. I have only listened to a couple of episodes, but I believe that it is a podcast where the only things being questioned are the viewpoints not shared by its creators. Question yourselves along with everything else.
Question and explain science, don’t just regurgitate it in a dry and boring way. Talk about religion rather than just put it down. Don’t spend so much time making fun of any and all things; it makes it hard to discern what you really want us to absorb. Provide concise and meaningful interviews rather than giving the excuse “we talked for 45 minutes and I don’t feel like editing it.”
Know that when you listen to this podcast, you are getting a specific “truth in podcasting,” one that is far more specific than the description would lead you to believe.
Of course, you shouldn’t take my word for it. Be more skeptical than they are and decide for yourself.”
scienceListener via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
12/21/05