We could not have been more excited to have the opportunity to speak to Mr Justice Mostyn before he retires at the end of the month.     We discuss Movers & Shakers – his highly successful podcast with five other Parkinson’s sufferers:   https://cureparkinsons.org.uk/2023/03/movers-shakers-six-familiar-faces-launch-podcast-about-living-with-parkinsons/    Plus his best case, and thoughts on transparency of course!      The Judge clarifies that Hildebrand documents are admissible if relevant, but the case of Immerman deals with professional conduct around such documents. The Judge explains and justified the rates used for Duxbury, and invites Resolution to attend future meetings about the rates.    Finally, for all Resolution members you will be pleased to hear that the Judge completely supports the proposition that there should be no difference between the Court’s powers if the parties are married or not.    This episode gets better and better as the Judge goes on.    During the discussion the Judge mentions:    RF v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] EWHC 3375 (Admin) – this is the case Mostyn J discussed being most proud of.  Xanthopoulos v Rakshina [2022] EWFC 30 refers to the case of J v J [2014] EWHC 3654 (Fam)   Evans v Evans [1990] 1 WLR 575, [1990] FLR 319  James v Seymour [2023] EWHC 844 (Fam) (child support)