“Bland and lifeless. Seems like someone high-up decided "we need a podcast" and it falls to the losers at foosball that week to be on it.
Hosts often sound uninterested and ill-prepared. Production quality is mediocre. Content is well-intended but would be better served by commentators who have something to say.
The Ars Technicast could be an insightful, dynamic counterpoint to the website. It's disappointing that this offering is so weak.”
BikeRanger via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
09/14/13