Rambling, no wit, no fun, and short on underlying ethical principles
I’m trying not to compare this podcast to Randy Cohen’s columns, or even to Klosterman’s attempted remake. The point-counterpoint format was a good idea, but fails dismally in execution. Too often the panelists have nothing relevant to add to each others’ rambling commentaries. Most often the panelists make no reference to ethical principles. Kenji (sp?) is consistently thoughtful and concise, the others drone. The subjects chosen are often more suitable for a “Miss Manners” column rather than ethical debate. A huge disappointment.
djk61 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 08/16/15
More reviews of The Ethicists
I listened to the old Ethicist on occasion but didn’t find it as engaging as this version. What I like about this new iteration is the following discussion, and how the debaters follow up their opinion with short examinations and reasoning. I think it could be even more interesting if somehow the...Read full review »
joshreese via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 02/26/15
I do wish there was more of a debate and that the group had to come up with only ONE answer between the 3 of them. That would make it more interesting, but I still love it!
feliciaalingu via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 05/30/15
Meh
Sometimes this podcast lapses into whiny liberal finger pointing. Also, they occasionally make comments/opinions regarding areas where they lack expertise (eg medicine, medical ethics) which is suboptimal. I really enjoy Kenji the most.
TrevorLH via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 09/07/15
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »