Concerns Over Platforming
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I have long listened to the FLI podcast with great admiration for their critical, timely discussions. Recently, however, since the change of hosts, the podcast has been platforming fear mongering LessWrong nerds that stack conjecture upon conjecture and jargon upon jargon to make for untasteful, overly speculative arguments ((fe fi fo) fum? fume?). This is most notable in the past two guests, as of 05/07/24. Previously, the discussions with guests had used anecdotal, evidence based arguments that could led their argument to future concerns. Now, especially in the AI discourse, I hear statements like “I’ve been doing this for so many years and so the way things will go is this…”
Please return to the discussions that use evidence (science based, art historical based, etc) to lead the listener to thinking about future of life. Currently the discussions feel so far removed and ungrounded, it’s becoming repulsive; hence, my overly negative attitude.”
For those whom it may concern via Apple Podcasts ·
Canada ·
05/07/24
More reviews of Future of Life Institute Podcast
“Definitely give it a go! Some esoteric stuff”
1ampers0n via Apple Podcasts ·
Netherlands ·
04/01/21
“Great, in depth interviews.”
457/26777633 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/29/23
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
