An Insult to its Listener’s Intelligence
To have a former attorney for the president go on the defensive for him in a large chunk of the first episode (presumably in the name of some sort of objectivity) is poor journalism at best, and a dereliction of journalistic duties at worst). A one-sided explainer from a man who has every motivation to lie about the president’s conduct, in the face of no less than 6 indictments of his campaign staff, and what is already known about the extent of Russian interference (not to mention money funneled into the NRA and various congressional super PACs) amounts to nothing more than a PR spin for the “president”. Having the host ask questions in quick succession in a an anxious tone doesn’t pass muster as an honest intellectual inquiry into the issues at hand.
Timbot5000 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 02/21/19
More reviews of The Investigation
I was expecting the typical anti-Trump approach that we get from the DC media, which includes ABC, the media for whom 93% of all their Trump-related stories have been presented with a negative spin. This podcast is definitely NOT that. Surprisingly and pleasingly, this podcast was matter-of-fact...Read full review »
SDJerry via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 02/12/19
This is utterly biased right wing propaganda. Fake news, dangerously labeled otherwise. Should be pulled.
JaneSmyth via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 03/13/19
Too willing to let Dowd broadcast a Trump commercial
Danahearn via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 02/21/19
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.