Description
Robert Anderson KC will take you through dissipation in the context of freezing orders, specifically what evidence can legitimately go into that section of the affidavit in support of the application for a freezer, dealing with the risk of dissipation.
This episode discusses:
· What constitutes a risk of dissipation?
· What is the purpose of a freezing order?
· What do you need to prove dissipation?
Upcoming episodes in the Fraud Litigation series include:
· Luka Krsljanin with After the Freezing Order (Part II)
· Tom Leary with I’d like my money back please: APP fraud and claims against the bank (Part III)
· Leona Powell with Provisional: Search Orders (Part IV)
Don’t forget to subscribe to The Litigation Podcast and share!
Blackstone Chambers’ Commercial Breakfast Briefing returns with an in-depth look at Commercial Remedies, beginning with some ground-breaking recent developments in the law and practice relating to freezing injunctions.
After some icebreakers from Andrew George KC in the Chair, Luka...
Published 11/14/24
Join Michael Beloff KC in the first episode of The Litigation Podcast Shorts, as he delves into one of his most memorable legal experiences: the Marshall cases. Michael successfully argued before the European Court of Justice, leading to a significant ruling upholding a complaint of...
Published 11/07/24